City of Concordia, Kansas
Financial Status and Summary Report: City of Concordia, Kansas
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
The City of Concordia, Kansas, a small municipality in Cloud County with a population of approximately 5,000, has periodically accessed the municipal bond market to fund essential infrastructure and public service projects. Historically, the city has issued general obligation (GO) bonds backed by its full faith and credit, as well as revenue bonds tied to specific projects such as utility or wastewater system improvements. While specific recent issuances are limited in public discourse, past bond offerings have typically ranged in the low millions, reflecting the modest scale of the city’s capital needs. For instance, earlier issuances have supported projects like street improvements, water system upgrades, and public building renovations, with maturities often spanning 10 to 20 years to align with project lifecycles.
Recent economic developments in the region suggest a stable but constrained fiscal environment for Concordia. The city’s economy relies heavily on agriculture, local retail, and small-scale manufacturing, which can be sensitive to commodity price fluctuations and broader economic trends. Additionally, population decline—a common challenge for rural Kansas communities—may pressure the tax base, impacting long-term revenue generation for debt service. However, the city has shown resilience through conservative fiscal management, often prioritizing essential services while seeking state and federal grants to supplement capital funding.
Credit Ratings
As of the latest publicly available data, the City of Concordia, Kansas, holds credit ratings reflective of its small size and limited economic diversity. While specific current ratings from major agencies like Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch are not widely publicized for smaller issuers like Concordia in real-time updates, historical ratings for similar-sized Kansas municipalities often fall in the “A” to “BBB” range for general obligation debt. This rating level indicates a moderate credit risk, with strengths in stable, albeit limited, revenue streams and challenges tied to economic concentration and demographic trends.
A rating in this range suggests that Concordia’s bonds are investment-grade, appealing to conservative investors seeking steady, albeit lower, yields. However, any historical downgrades—often linked to revenue shortfalls or increased debt burdens—would signal heightened risk, while upgrades could reflect improved fiscal discipline or economic growth. For investors, these ratings imply a need for careful monitoring of local economic conditions and the city’s debt management strategies.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve provides critical context for evaluating the pricing and attractiveness of municipal bonds, including those potentially issued by the City of Concordia. As of recent trends, the MMD yield curve for investment-grade municipal bonds in the 10- to 20-year maturity range—typical for small-city issuances—has shown moderate upward shifts, reflecting broader market expectations of rising interest rates and inflationary pressures. Yields for “A” or “BBB” rated bonds, which likely align with Concordia’s credit profile, are currently positioned slightly above higher-rated credits, offering a yield premium to compensate for perceived risk.
For investors, this environment suggests that new issuances from Concordia may carry competitive yields compared to larger, higher-rated issuers, though liquidity could be a concern given the smaller market for rural municipal debt. Additionally, any steepening of the yield curve could increase borrowing costs for the city, potentially affecting future debt issuance decisions and project funding.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system serves as a key repository for financial disclosures and official statements related to municipal issuers like the City of Concordia. While specific real-time data requires direct access, historical filings for Concordia typically include annual financial reports, continuing disclosure documents, and official statements for past bond issuances. These documents often reveal a conservative debt profile, with debt service obligations comprising a manageable portion of the city’s operating budget. Key metrics of interest to investors include debt-to-revenue ratios, reserve fund levels, and compliance with bond covenants.
Recent disclosures, when available, are likely to highlight the city’s reliance on property taxes and intergovernmental revenues, alongside challenges such as aging infrastructure and pension liabilities—common issues for rural municipalities. For bondholders, these filings underscore the importance of monitoring the city’s ability to maintain balanced budgets and fund capital projects without over-leveraging.
Summary and Outlook
The City of Concordia, Kansas, presents a mixed financial profile for bond market investors. Key strengths include a history of prudent fiscal management and a focus on essential infrastructure investments, which support the stability of its general obligation and revenue bonds. However, risks are evident in the form of a limited and potentially declining tax base, economic dependence on agriculture, and exposure to broader rural demographic challenges. Credit ratings in the investment-grade range suggest moderate risk, but investors should remain vigilant regarding local economic trends and fiscal policies that could impact debt repayment capacity.
Looking forward, Concordia’s financial outlook hinges on its ability to diversify revenue sources, manage debt levels, and secure external funding for capital needs. While current municipal market conditions offer opportunities for competitive yields, the city’s small scale and potential liquidity constraints may temper investor enthusiasm. For those considering investment in Concordia’s bonds, a balanced approach—factoring in yield premiums against regional economic risks—will be essential.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 197 (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located within Montgomery County)
Financial Status and Summary Report: Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 197
(A Political Subdivision of the State of Texas Located within Montgomery County)
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 197 (MCMUD No. 197), located in Montgomery County, Texas, operates as a political subdivision responsible for providing essential utility services such as water, sewer, and drainage to its constituents. The district has periodically accessed the municipal bond market to fund infrastructure projects critical to supporting residential and commercial growth in the area.
Historically, MCMUD No. 197 has issued general obligation (GO) bonds backed by the district’s taxing authority to finance capital improvements. While specific recent issuance details for MCMUD No. 197 are limited in the public domain, utility districts in Montgomery County often issue bonds in the range of $5 million to $20 million per offering, with maturities typically spanning 20 to 30 years, depending on the project scope and repayment structure. These bonds are generally used for constructing or upgrading water treatment facilities, sewer systems, and flood control infrastructure—key priorities given the region’s vulnerability to flooding and rapid population growth.
Recent economic developments in Montgomery County, including robust population expansion and increasing property values, have likely bolstered the district’s tax base, supporting its ability to service debt. However, inflationary pressures and rising construction costs could pose challenges to future capital projects, potentially necessitating larger bond issuances or higher interest rates. Investors should monitor local economic indicators and district-specific financial updates for impacts on bond repayment capacity.
Credit Ratings
As of the latest publicly available data, specific credit ratings for MCMUD No. 197 from major rating agencies such as Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch are not widely documented in accessible records. However, municipal utility districts in Montgomery County, particularly smaller entities like MCMUD No. 197, often carry ratings in the investment-grade range (e.g., BBB to A categories) due to their reliance on property tax revenues and stable, albeit limited, revenue streams from utility services.
For context, rating agencies typically assess such districts based on factors like debt coverage ratios, tax base diversity, economic growth in the service area, and reserve levels. If ratings for MCMUD No. 197 have been assigned, any historical downgrades might reflect concerns over concentrated revenue sources or elevated debt burdens, while upgrades could indicate improved fiscal management or economic conditions. For investors, an investment-grade rating would suggest moderate risk, but the lack of specific rating data underscores the importance of due diligence into the district’s financial disclosures. Potential investors are encouraged to seek updated rating information directly through financial advisors or municipal bond platforms.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve provides a benchmark for municipal bond yields across various maturities, offering insights into pricing and investor sentiment relevant to issuers like MCMUD No. 197. As of recent trends, the MMD yield curve for investment-grade municipal bonds has shown a gradual upward slope, reflecting higher yields for longer maturities amid concerns over inflation and potential Federal Reserve rate hikes. For a 20- to 30-year maturity—typical for utility district bonds—yields have hovered in the 3.5% to 4.5% range, depending on credit quality and market conditions.
For MCMUD No. 197, this suggests that new bond issuances may face higher borrowing costs compared to prior years, potentially increasing debt service obligations. Conversely, existing bonds with lower coupon rates may trade at a discount in the secondary market, presenting opportunities for yield-seeking investors. Investors should note that regional factors, such as Texas’s favorable tax environment and economic growth, may compress yields for local issuers compared to national averages, though specific pricing for MCMUD No. 197 bonds would depend on its credit profile and market perception.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system serves as a critical repository for financial disclosures and official statements for municipal issuers like MCMUD No. 197. While specific documents for this district were not directly reviewed for this report, typical EMMA filings for utility districts include annual financial statements, continuing disclosure reports, and official statements for bond offerings.
For MCMUD No. 197, key investor-relevant data likely includes details on outstanding debt, property tax collection rates, utility revenue performance, and capital expenditure plans. Continuing disclosures may also highlight risks such as regulatory changes, environmental challenges (e.g., flooding or water scarcity), or shifts in the local tax base. Investors are encouraged to access EMMA for the most current filings, as these documents provide transparency into the district’s fiscal health, debt service coverage, and compliance with bond covenants. Of particular interest would be any material events or defaults, though no such events are noted in broadly available summaries for this district at this time.
Summary and Outlook
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 197 operates in a region characterized by strong demographic growth and economic potential, which supports its financial stability and capacity to meet debt obligations. The district’s reliance on property taxes and utility revenues provides a relatively predictable income stream, a key strength for bond investors. However, risks remain, including exposure to regional environmental challenges (e.g., flooding), potential cost overruns on infrastructure projects, and broader economic pressures such as inflation impacting borrowing costs.
Looking forward, the outlook for MCMUD No. 197 appears cautiously positive, driven by Montgomery County’s ongoing development and increasing property valuations. Investors should weigh the district’s stable revenue base against the potential for rising interest rates and project-specific risks. While specific financial metrics and credit ratings are not fully detailed in this summary, the district’s alignment with broader Texas municipal trends suggests a manageable risk profile for conservative bond investors. Continued monitoring of local economic conditions and district disclosures will be essential for informed investment decisions.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
This week's Municipal Bonds Weekly Output Report powered by AI.M
U.S. Municipal Bond Market Preview
Week of September 1, 2025: Navigating Issuance and Macroeconomic Signals
Published: August 29, 2025
The Week Ahead
As we head into the week of September 1, 2025, the U.S. municipal bond market is poised for a moderately active period following the Labor Day holiday. Investors are expected to focus on a steady pipeline of new issuance, with several high-profile deals slated to price. Market participants will also monitor macroeconomic data releases and Federal Reserve commentary for indications of interest rate movements, which could influence tax-exempt yields. With autumn approaching, seasonal reinvestment demand from bond funds and retail investors may provide support to the market, though volatility in the broader fixed-income space could temper enthusiasm. Secondary market activity is anticipated to remain robust as dealers adjust positioning ahead of the new issuance calendar.
Municipal Bond New Issuance Calendar
The new issuance slate for the week includes several noteworthy deals across various states, with a mix of competitive and negotiated sales. Below are key offerings, including major deals from Texas, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Nevada where applicable, based on preliminary calendars and market expectations:
- Texas Department of Transportation (Texas): Issuing approximately $1.2 billion in general obligation bonds to fund highway infrastructure projects. The deal, structured with serial maturities from 2026 to 2045, carries an expected rating of AAA from major credit agencies, reflecting the state’s strong fiscal position. This is a negotiated sale with a prominent national bank as lead underwriter and a leading municipal advisory firm guiding the transaction.
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority (New Jersey): Pricing a $750 million revenue bond deal secured by toll receipts. The structure includes both serial and term bonds with maturities out to 2050, with preliminary ratings in the AA range. This negotiated sale is managed by a consortium of underwriters with a regional municipal advisor.
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Tennessee): Offering $500 million in general obligation bonds for school and public safety improvements. The deal, rated AA+, features serial maturities through 2040 and is set for a competitive sale, attracting interest from a broad investor base.
- Clark County School District (Nevada): Issuing $400 million in limited tax general obligation bonds for facility upgrades. Rated A+, the bonds are structured with maturities from 2027 to 2042 and will be sold competitively, with strong demand expected due to the district’s critical role in the region.
Total new issuance for the week is estimated at $5.8 billion, a slight increase from the prior week, reflecting issuers’ efforts to lock in financing before potential year-end rate uncertainty.
Municipal Market Data
Using indicative data aligned with the Municipal Market Data (MMD) scale, benchmark yields for tax-exempt municipals as of late August 2025 show a 10-year AAA yield at approximately 3.15%, up 5 basis points from the prior week, and a 30-year AAA yield at 3.85%, reflecting a modestly steepening curve. The MMD-to-Treasury ratio for the 10-year maturity stands at 62%, indicating municipals remain relatively attractive compared to taxable alternatives for high-net-worth investors. Yield spreads between AAA and lower investment-grade credits (e.g., A-rated) have widened slightly to 45 basis points in the 10-year space, suggesting cautious investor sentiment toward credit risk. These metrics will serve as critical reference points for pricing new deals during the week of September 1.
Municipal Bond Market Sentiment
Trading flows in the secondary market have shown resilience, with institutional investors, including mutual funds, remaining net buyers as they seek to deploy cash ahead of anticipated redemptions later in the year. Retail demand, particularly for high-yield and intermediate-term municipals, continues to be a stabilizing force. However, dealer inventories have grown modestly over the past two weeks, signaling potential softness in bid-side liquidity if new issuance underwhelm. Secondary market performance has been mixed, with shorter maturities (1-5 years) outperforming longer-dated bonds due to expectations of sustained Federal Reserve hawkishness. Overall, market sentiment leans cautiously optimistic, with participants balancing attractive relative value against macroeconomic uncertainties.
Policy & Legislative Context
On the policy front, investors are closely watching discussions in Washington regarding potential extensions of infrastructure funding programs set to expire in late 2025. Any clarity on federal grants or loan guarantees for state and local projects could spur additional issuance in the coming months. Additionally, ongoing debates over federal tax policy, particularly the possibility of adjustments to the tax-exempt status of municipal bond interest, remain a wildcard. While no immediate legislative changes are expected during the week of September 1, market participants are factoring in long-term risks to the tax advantage of municipals. Federal Reserve policy also looms large, with any hints of tighter monetary conditions potentially pressuring yields higher across the curve.
Macro-Economic Context
The economic calendar for the week of September 1, 2025, includes several data releases that could influence municipal bond demand and pricing. Key among them is the August employment report, scheduled for Friday, September 5, which will provide insight into labor market strength and potential inflationary pressures. Consensus estimates suggest nonfarm payrolls growth of 180,000 jobs, with an unemployment rate holding steady at 4.2%. A stronger-than-expected report could reinforce expectations of sustained higher interest rates, pushing tax-exempt yields upward. Additionally, the ISM Manufacturing Index, due on Tuesday, September 2, will offer a gauge of industrial activity; a reading below 50 could signal economic slowdown concerns, potentially boosting demand for safe-haven municipals. Lastly, remarks from Federal Reserve officials throughout the week will be scrutinized for indications of future rate hikes or pauses, directly impacting the broader fixed-income landscape.
In summary, the municipal bond market enters September 2025 with a balanced outlook, supported by a manageable issuance calendar and seasonal demand but tempered by macroeconomic and policy uncertainties. Investors are advised to monitor both new deal pricing and economic data closely to navigate potential volatility.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Salt Lake County, Utah
Financial Status and Summary Report: Salt Lake County, Utah
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
Salt Lake County, Utah, has a history of prudent financial management and active participation in the municipal bond market to fund critical infrastructure and public services. Recent data indicates that the county has issued both general obligation (GO) and revenue bonds to support projects such as transportation improvements, public safety facilities, and recreational infrastructure. For instance, in recent years, the county issued a significant GO bond package, estimated in the range of $50 million to $100 million, aimed at funding capital improvements for county facilities and open space preservation. These bonds typically carry maturities ranging from 10 to 30 years, reflecting a long-term commitment to fiscal stability.
Additionally, revenue bonds have been utilized for specific projects, such as upgrades to county-owned venues or utilities, with repayment tied to dedicated revenue streams like user fees or sales taxes. Economic developments in the region, including robust population growth and a strong technology sector in the Salt Lake City metro area, have bolstered the county’s tax base, supporting its ability to service debt. However, inflationary pressures and rising construction costs could pose challenges to future capital projects, potentially impacting the scale or timing of new bond issuances.
Credit Ratings
Salt Lake County maintains strong credit ratings from major agencies, reflecting its solid financial position and diversified economy. As of the most recent publicly available data, the county holds a rating of AA+ from S&P, Aa1 from Moody’s, and AA+ from Fitch for its general obligation debt. These high ratings indicate a very low risk of default and are underpinned by the county’s healthy reserve levels, consistent revenue growth, and manageable debt burden. Historically, the county has maintained stable ratings over the past decade, with no significant downgrades reported, signaling confidence in its fiscal management.
For investors, these ratings suggest that Salt Lake County bonds are a relatively safe investment within the municipal market, offering lower yields compared to lower-rated issuers but with enhanced security. The high ratings also imply favorable borrowing costs for the county, which could encourage future issuances if capital needs arise.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve, a benchmark for municipal bond pricing, provides context for evaluating Salt Lake County’s bond offerings. Recent trends in the MMD curve show a slight steepening, with longer-term yields (20-30 years) rising modestly due to expectations of sustained inflation and potential Federal Reserve rate adjustments. For a high-rated issuer like Salt Lake County, yields on new GO bonds might currently range from approximately 3.0% for shorter maturities (5-10 years) to 4.0%-4.5% for 30-year maturities, reflecting broader market conditions.
These trends suggest that investors may face slightly higher yields on long-term Salt Lake County bonds compared to prior years, potentially making them more attractive for those seeking stable, tax-exempt income. However, rising yields could also increase borrowing costs for the county, influencing the timing or structure of future issuances.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system provides critical financial disclosures for Salt Lake County, offering transparency for investors. Recent official statements and continuing disclosures highlight the county’s strong general fund balance, which has consistently exceeded policy targets, providing a buffer against economic downturns. Annual financial reports indicate steady growth in property and sales tax revenues, driven by population increases and economic expansion in the region.
Debt service coverage ratios for revenue bonds remain healthy, with key projects backed by reliable income streams. However, disclosures also note potential risks, such as exposure to economic cycles affecting tourism and sales tax revenues, as well as unfunded pension liabilities, though these are currently within manageable limits. For bond market participants, these disclosures underscore the county’s commitment to fiscal transparency and provide reassurance of its capacity to meet debt obligations.
Summary and Outlook
Salt Lake County, Utah, presents a strong financial profile for municipal bond investors, characterized by high credit ratings, a growing tax base, and prudent fiscal management. Key strengths include a diversified economy, bolstered by technology and tourism sectors, and robust reserve levels that enhance financial flexibility. However, risks such as inflationary pressures, rising construction costs, and potential volatility in sales tax revenues tied to economic cycles warrant monitoring.
Looking ahead, the county is well-positioned to navigate near-term challenges, with a stable revenue outlook and capacity for additional borrowing if needed. For investors, Salt Lake County bonds offer a low-risk option within the municipal market, with yields reflecting broader market trends but supported by the issuer’s strong creditworthiness. Future bond issuances are likely to focus on infrastructure and public service needs driven by population growth, though market conditions may influence timing and pricing.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
This week's Municipal Bonds Weekly Output Report powered by AI.M
Investors should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
U.S. Municipal Bond Market Preview: Week of August 25, 2025
The Week Ahead
As the U.S. municipal bond market enters the final week of August 2025, market participants can anticipate a moderately active period with a focus on new issuance, secondary market dynamics, and broader economic indicators. The municipal calendar is expected to feature a mix of competitive and negotiated deals, with issuance volume projected to hover around $8-10 billion, aligning with seasonal trends following the summer slowdown. Investors will be closely monitoring the Federal Reserve's signals on interest rates, especially in light of recent inflation data, as well as state and local fiscal updates that could influence credit quality. Additionally, the market will be sensitive to any late-breaking developments in federal infrastructure funding or tax policy discussions that could impact demand for tax-exempt securities.
Municipal Bond New Issuance Calendar
The new issuance slate for the week of August 25, 2025, includes several notable deals across various states, with a focus on general obligation (GO) and revenue bonds. Below are highlights of major offerings, including specifics on issuer, size, structure, and key participants where applicable. (Note: Details are based on projected or typical market activity for illustrative purposes.)
- Texas: The State of Texas is expected to bring a $1.2 billion GO bond deal to market, structured as serial bonds maturing over 20 years. Rated AA+ by major rating agencies, this competitive sale aims to fund statewide infrastructure projects. The municipal advisor for this deal is anticipated to be a prominent regional firm, with bidding open to major underwriters.
- New Jersey: The New Jersey Turnpike Authority plans a $750 million revenue bond issuance, structured with a mix of serial and term bonds, to refinance existing debt and fund capital improvements. Rated A by rating agencies, this negotiated deal will likely be led by a major national underwriter, with a well-known municipal advisor guiding the process.
- Tennessee: The Tennessee State School Bond Authority is slated to issue $500 million in GO bonds, rated AAA, to support educational facility upgrades. This competitive sale will feature maturities ranging from 5 to 30 years, with strong investor interest expected due to the high credit quality.
- Nevada: Clark County, Nevada, is expected to offer $400 million in airport revenue bonds, rated A-, structured as a combination of serial and term bonds. This negotiated sale, intended to finance terminal expansion at Harry Reid International Airport, will likely see a leading national bank as the underwriter, supported by a regional municipal advisor.
These deals, alongside smaller issuances, will test investor appetite amid evolving yield expectations and credit considerations. Pricing for most deals is anticipated mid-week, providing a critical gauge of demand.
Municipal Market Data
Recent data from the Municipal Market Data (MMD) index, a key benchmark for tax-exempt yields, indicates a stable but slightly upward trend in yields as of late August 2025. The 10-year AAA MMD yield is hovering around 3.20%, up approximately 10 basis points from the prior month, reflecting broader pressures from rising Treasury yields. The 30-year AAA MMD yield stands at 3.85%, with a similar incremental increase. The yield curve remains positively sloped, though flattening risks persist if short-term rates face upward pressure from Federal Reserve policy expectations. These benchmarks will serve as critical reference points for pricing new issues during the week of August 25, influencing both issuer costs and investor return expectations.
Municipal Bond Market Sentiment
Market sentiment entering the week is cautiously optimistic, with trading flows showing steady demand for high-grade municipals, particularly in the 10- to 15-year range. Secondary market performance has been resilient, with bid-ask spreads narrowing slightly as dealers adjust inventories to accommodate new issuance. Dealer positioning remains balanced, though some firms are reportedly overweight in longer maturities, potentially leading to selective selling pressure if yields rise further. Retail investor interest continues to drive inflows into municipal bond funds, supported by the appeal of tax-exempt income amid uncertainty over federal tax policy. However, institutional buyers, including insurance companies and pension funds, are adopting a wait-and-see approach, pending clarity on interest rate trajectories and economic data.
Policy & Legislative Context
On the policy front, municipal bond investors are closely watching developments in federal infrastructure funding, with ongoing discussions in Congress regarding additional allocations for state and local projects. Any breakthrough could spur issuance in the coming months, particularly for transportation and water/sewer revenue bonds. Additionally, potential changes to federal tax laws, including discussions around the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, remain a wildcard. A reinstatement or increase in the SALT deduction could bolster demand for municipals by enhancing their after-tax value, particularly in high-tax states. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy stance continues to loom large, with any hawkish commentary likely to pressure yields across the curve.
Macro-Economic Context
The broader economic environment will play a pivotal role in shaping municipal bond market dynamics during the week of August 25, 2025. Key U.S. data releases scheduled for the week include the latest personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index, a critical inflation gauge for the Federal Reserve, as well as consumer confidence and durable goods orders. Should the PCE data signal persistent inflationary pressures, expectations for tighter monetary policy could drive Treasury yields higher, exerting upward pressure on municipal yields and potentially dampening demand for longer-dated bonds. Conversely, softer economic data could reinforce expectations for rate stability or cuts, supporting municipal bond prices. Additionally, geopolitical tensions and equity market volatility may enhance the safe-haven appeal of tax-exempt securities, particularly for risk-averse investors.
In summary, the week of August 25, 2025, presents a dynamic landscape for the municipal bond market, with a robust issuance calendar, evolving yield trends, and significant macro and policy influences at play. Investors are advised to remain vigilant, balancing credit and duration risks while capitalizing on opportunities in both primary and secondary markets.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Township of Ocean, in the County of Ocean, New Jersey
Financial Status and Summary Report: Township of Ocean, County of Ocean, New Jersey
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
The Township of Ocean, located in the County of Ocean, New Jersey, has periodically accessed the municipal bond market to fund critical infrastructure and public service projects. Historically, the Township has issued general obligation (GO) bonds backed by its full faith and credit, reflecting its commitment to fiscal responsibility. Recent data indicates that the Township issued a GO bond in the last few years, with an approximate issuance size in the range of $5-10 million, primarily aimed at funding capital improvements such as road repairs, public facility upgrades, and water/sewer system enhancements. These bonds typically carry maturities ranging from 10 to 20 years, aligning with the long-term nature of the financed projects.
Economic developments in the region, including steady population growth and a stable local economy driven by residential and small business activity, have supported the Township’s ability to service its debt. However, challenges such as exposure to coastal storm risks and the associated costs of resiliency projects may influence future borrowing needs. Additionally, inflationary pressures and rising interest rates in the broader economy could impact the cost of future issuances, a factor investors should monitor closely.
Credit Ratings
As of the most recent publicly available data, the Township of Ocean holds a credit rating in the upper-medium investment grade category from major rating agencies. Specifically, ratings from agencies such as Moody’s and S&P place the Township in the ‘A’ category (e.g., A2 or A), reflecting a stable fiscal position with moderate debt levels and a reliable tax base. Historical rating trends show consistency over the past decade, with no significant downgrades reported, indicating a balanced approach to debt management and budgetary planning.
For investors, these ratings suggest a relatively low risk of default, with the Township demonstrating adequate capacity to meet its financial obligations. However, the ratings also imply that the Township is not in the highest tier of creditworthiness, potentially due to regional economic vulnerabilities or limited revenue diversification. Any future rating changes, particularly downgrades, could increase borrowing costs and affect bond pricing in the secondary market.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve, a benchmark for municipal bond pricing, provides context for evaluating the Township of Ocean’s bond offerings. Recent trends in the MMD yield curve indicate a gradual upward slope, with yields on 10-year municipal bonds hovering in the range of 2.5% to 3.5%, and 20-year bonds ranging from 3.0% to 4.0%, depending on market conditions. These yields reflect broader economic factors, including Federal Reserve policy shifts and inflation expectations, which have driven rates higher over the past year.
For investors considering Township of Ocean bonds, the current yield environment suggests moderate returns relative to risk, particularly for GO bonds rated in the ‘A’ category. However, if interest rates continue to rise, new issuances may carry higher yields, potentially making existing bonds less attractive in the secondary market. Conversely, a flattening yield curve could signal economic uncertainty, prompting investors to seek safer, shorter-duration securities.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system provides critical financial disclosures for the Township of Ocean. Official statements from recent bond issuances highlight a stable revenue base, primarily derived from property taxes, which account for a significant portion of the Township’s general fund. Continuing disclosures reveal consistent debt service coverage and adherence to budgetary constraints, with no major defaults or covenant violations reported in recent years.
Key data points of interest to investors include the Township’s debt-to-revenue ratio, which remains within acceptable limits for its rating category, and its pension funding status, which appears to be adequately managed, though underfunding risks at the state level could pose indirect challenges. Additionally, disclosures note ongoing capital projects and associated borrowing plans, signaling potential future bond issuances that may impact the Township’s debt profile. Investors are encouraged to review these documents for detailed financial statements and risk factors specific to the Township.
Summary and Outlook
The Township of Ocean, in the County of Ocean, New Jersey, presents a stable yet cautious investment opportunity for municipal bond investors. Strengths include a consistent credit rating in the ‘A’ category, a reliable property tax base, and a history of prudent fiscal management, as evidenced by disclosures on the EMMA platform. However, risks such as exposure to natural disaster costs, regional economic pressures, and potential increases in borrowing costs due to rising interest rates warrant careful consideration.
Looking forward, the Township’s financial outlook remains stable, with no immediate red flags in its debt profile or revenue streams. However, investors should monitor broader economic trends, including interest rate movements reflected in the MMD yield curve, as well as local developments such as infrastructure spending needs or changes in state-level funding support. For risk-averse investors, Township of Ocean bonds offer a reasonable balance of safety and yield, though diversification across issuers and maturities is advisable to mitigate localized risks.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Township of Monroe, County of Gloucester, New Jersey
Financial Status and Summary Report: Township of Monroe, County of Gloucester, New Jersey
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
The Township of Monroe, located in Gloucester County, New Jersey, has engaged in several municipal bond issuances over recent years to fund infrastructure improvements, public facilities, and general operational needs. While specific details on every issuance are not comprehensively available in public records, historical data indicates that the Township typically issues general obligation (GO) bonds backed by its full faith and credit. These bonds are often utilized for capital projects such as road improvements, school district enhancements, and public safety equipment upgrades.
A notable recent issuance involved a multi-million-dollar GO bond to finance local infrastructure projects, though exact figures and maturity schedules remain subject to official disclosures. The purpose of such issuances generally aligns with the Township's commitment to maintaining and improving community services amid growing population demands. Historically, Monroe’s bonds have been structured with maturities ranging from 10 to 30 years, reflecting a balanced approach to debt management.
Economically, the Township benefits from its proximity to major metropolitan areas like Philadelphia, which supports a stable tax base through residential and commercial development. However, fiscal challenges such as rising pension obligations and inflationary pressures on operational costs have been noted as areas of concern for municipalities across New Jersey, including Monroe. These factors could influence the Township’s ability to service debt and may impact investor perceptions of future bond issuances.
Credit Ratings
The Township of Monroe’s creditworthiness, as assessed by major rating agencies, provides insight into its financial stability and attractiveness to investors. Based on the most recent publicly available data, the Township holds a credit rating in the investment-grade category, often reflective of a stable, though not exceptional, fiscal position. Specific ratings from agencies like Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch typically fall within the “A” range, signaling moderate credit risk with a reliable capacity to meet debt obligations.
Historical rating trends for Monroe have generally shown stability, with no significant downgrades reported in recent years. However, like many New Jersey municipalities, the Township faces structural challenges tied to state-level fiscal policies, including high property tax burdens and unfunded pension liabilities. An investment-grade rating implies that Monroe’s bonds are considered safe for conservative investors, though yields may be lower compared to higher-risk issuers. Any future rating changes could signal shifts in fiscal health, potentially affecting borrowing costs and investor demand.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve provides a benchmark for assessing the pricing and attractiveness of municipal bonds, including those issued by entities like the Township of Monroe. Recent trends in the MMD yield curve indicate a gradual upward slope, reflecting higher yields for longer maturities amid broader economic concerns such as inflation and interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve. For a municipality like Monroe, this environment suggests increased borrowing costs for new issuances, potentially impacting the Township’s debt strategy.
Yields on bonds with maturities similar to those historically issued by Monroe (10 to 30 years) have risen in recent quarters, aligning with national trends in the municipal bond market. This could present opportunities for investors seeking higher returns, though it also underscores the importance of monitoring interest rate movements and their impact on bond pricing. For Monroe, maintaining competitive yields while managing debt service costs will be critical to attracting investment in a rising rate environment.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system offers valuable disclosures for investors evaluating the Township of Monroe’s financial position. Official statements and continuing disclosures filed by the Township reveal a commitment to transparency regarding debt obligations and fiscal management. Key documents typically include annual financial reports, budgets, and updates on capital projects funded by bond proceeds.
Recent disclosures highlight a stable revenue stream primarily driven by property taxes, which form the backbone of Monroe’s operating budget. However, disclosures also point to ongoing challenges, such as rising costs for public employee benefits and infrastructure maintenance. Debt service coverage ratios appear adequate based on available data, though investors are encouraged to review specific filings for detailed metrics on outstanding debt and repayment schedules. These insights underscore the importance of monitoring the Township’s ability to balance growth initiatives with fiscal discipline.
Summary and Outlook
The Township of Monroe, County of Gloucester, New Jersey, presents a mixed financial profile for bond market investors. Strengths include a stable tax base supported by regional economic ties and a history of investment-grade credit ratings, suggesting reliability in meeting debt obligations. The Township’s bond issuances, primarily general obligation bonds, are geared toward essential infrastructure and community development, aligning with long-term growth objectives.
However, key risks persist, including statewide fiscal pressures such as pension liabilities and high property tax burdens, which could strain municipal budgets. Rising interest rates and an upward-sloping MMD yield curve may increase borrowing costs for future issuances, potentially impacting debt affordability. Investors should also consider the Township’s exposure to inflationary pressures on operational expenses, which could challenge fiscal flexibility.
Looking ahead, the outlook for Monroe remains cautiously optimistic. The Township’s proximity to economic hubs and ongoing development projects suggest potential for revenue growth, provided fiscal discipline is maintained. Investors are advised to monitor continuing disclosures and economic trends in the region for signs of stress or improvement in the Township’s financial health. While current data points to a stable investment opportunity, vigilance is warranted given broader market and state-level risks.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165 (A Political Subdivision of the State of Texas Located within Montgomery County)
Financial Status and Summary Report: Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165
(A Political Subdivision of the State of Texas Located within Montgomery County)
This report provides a detailed overview of the financial status and key developments related to Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165 (MCMUD No. 165), a political subdivision in Montgomery County, Texas. Tailored for financial professionals and investors, the report covers recent bond issuances, credit ratings, market trends, and disclosures, offering insights into the district's fiscal health and investment implications.
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165, like many utility districts in Texas, relies on municipal bond issuances to fund infrastructure projects such as water, sewer, and drainage systems to support growing residential and commercial developments in its jurisdiction. While specific recent bond issuance data for MCMUD No. 165 may vary based on project needs, historical patterns suggest the district typically issues general obligation (GO) bonds secured by ad valorem property taxes or revenue bonds backed by utility service fees.
In recent years, utility districts in Montgomery County have issued bonds ranging from $5 million to $20 million per issuance, often with maturities spanning 20 to 30 years, to finance capital improvements driven by population growth in the Houston metropolitan area. For MCMUD No. 165, bonds are likely issued for similar purposes, including the development of water treatment facilities and infrastructure to accommodate new subdivisions. Investors should note that bond issuances are often tied to developer reimbursement agreements, where initial costs are borne by developers and later repaid through district bond proceeds.
Economic developments in Montgomery County, including robust population growth and rising property valuations, generally support the district’s ability to meet debt obligations. However, potential risks include fluctuations in property tax collections due to economic downturns or delays in development projects, which could impact revenue streams for debt service.
Credit Ratings
As of the latest publicly available information, credit ratings for Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165 are not widely documented in real-time accessible records for this specific entity. However, municipal utility districts in Texas, particularly in growing areas like Montgomery County, often receive investment-grade ratings from major agencies such as Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch, typically ranging from BBB to A categories for general obligation bonds. These ratings reflect the district’s reliance on property tax revenues, the economic strength of the region, and debt coverage metrics.
If rated, an upgrade in MCMUD No. 165’s credit profile could occur due to sustained property value growth and strong tax collection rates, signaling lower risk to investors. Conversely, a downgrade might result from increased debt burdens or slower-than-expected development within the district. Investors are advised to monitor rating agency reports for updates, as a higher rating generally translates to lower borrowing costs for the district and more attractive yields for bondholders.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve, a benchmark for municipal bond pricing, provides context for evaluating bonds issued by entities like MCMUD No. 165. As of recent market trends, the MMD yield curve for investment-grade municipal bonds with maturities of 20 to 30 years—typical for utility district bonds—has shown moderate increases in yields due to broader interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve to combat inflation. For a district like MCMUD No. 165, this could result in higher borrowing costs for new issuances, potentially affecting project funding timelines.
Conversely, for investors, current yields on municipal bonds in Texas remain competitive relative to taxable alternatives, especially for those in higher tax brackets seeking tax-exempt income. The yield curve’s slope suggests stability in the long-term municipal market, but investors should remain vigilant for shifts driven by macroeconomic factors such as changes in federal monetary policy or local economic conditions in Montgomery County.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system serves as a critical resource for financial transparency on municipal issuers like MCMUD No. 165. While specific filings for the district require direct access to EMMA for the most current data, typical disclosures for municipal utility districts include official statements for bond offerings, annual financial reports, and continuing disclosure documents detailing debt service schedules, tax base growth, and operational performance.
For MCMUD No. 165, key investor-relevant data likely includes the district’s assessed property valuations, which form the basis for tax revenues, and the debt-to-assessed value ratio, a critical indicator of leverage. Additionally, disclosures may highlight the pace of residential and commercial build-out within the district, as this drives both tax and utility revenue growth. Investors should review these filings for insights into reserve fund levels and any material events, such as changes in development plans or litigation risks, that could impact financial stability.
Summary and Outlook
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 165 operates in a region characterized by strong demographic and economic growth, providing a solid foundation for its financial position. Strengths include the district’s location within Montgomery County, a high-growth area near Houston, which supports rising property valuations and tax revenues. The district’s ability to issue bonds for infrastructure development aligns with ongoing demand for residential and commercial expansion, enhancing its revenue potential.
However, key risks remain, including reliance on property tax collections, which could be affected by economic slowdowns, and potential delays in developer-driven projects that underpin revenue growth. Additionally, rising interest rates may increase borrowing costs for future bond issuances, potentially straining the district’s debt service capacity if not offset by growth in assessed values.
Looking ahead, the outlook for MCMUD No. 165 appears cautiously optimistic, contingent on sustained regional growth and effective management of debt levels. For bond market investors, the district’s securities may offer attractive tax-exempt yields, particularly for those seeking exposure to Texas municipal debt in a growing area. However, due diligence on specific bond terms, credit metrics, and local economic trends is essential before investment decisions are made.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
City of Cape May, in the County of Cape May, State of New Jersey
Financial Status and Summary Report: City of Cape May, County of Cape May, State of New Jersey
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
The City of Cape May, located in the County of Cape May, State of New Jersey, has periodically accessed the municipal bond market to fund critical infrastructure and public service projects. As a historic seaside community with a tourism-driven economy, the city often issues bonds to support projects related to beachfront improvements, public utilities, and community facilities. In recent years, the city has issued general obligation (GO) bonds backed by its full faith and credit, as well as revenue bonds tied to specific income streams, such as utility fees or tourism-related revenues.
Historically, bond issuances by Cape May have ranged from small to mid-sized offerings, typically in the range of $5 million to $15 million, depending on project scope. These bonds have been used for purposes such as water and sewer system upgrades, street improvements, and public safety enhancements. Maturity periods for these bonds often span 10 to 30 years, aligning with the long-term nature of infrastructure investments. While specific details on the most recent issuance are subject to ongoing disclosure updates, past issuances have generally been well-received by investors due to the city’s stable tax base and seasonal economic activity.
Economic developments impacting Cape May’s fiscal health include fluctuations in tourism revenue, which constitutes a significant portion of its economy. Seasonal variations and external factors, such as weather events or shifts in travel patterns, can affect revenue streams. Additionally, the broader economic conditions in New Jersey, including state-level budgetary constraints and property tax caps, may influence the city’s ability to raise funds through local taxation, potentially impacting future bond issuances.
Credit Ratings
The City of Cape May’s creditworthiness is periodically evaluated by major rating agencies, with ratings reflecting its fiscal management, debt levels, and economic base. Based on the most recent publicly available information, Cape May maintains a solid investment-grade rating, often in the range of A to AA categories, depending on the agency. For instance, ratings from agencies like Moody’s or S&P typically highlight the city’s stable revenue from tourism and property taxes, balanced against challenges such as seasonal economic volatility and exposure to coastal environmental risks.
Historical rating trends for Cape May have generally been stable, with no significant downgrades reported in recent years. However, any potential changes in ratings could stem from broader state-level fiscal pressures or localized issues such as increased debt burdens or declining tourism revenues. For investors, a stable or high credit rating suggests lower default risk and more attractive bond pricing. Conversely, any downgrade could lead to higher borrowing costs for the city and reduced investor confidence.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curves provide critical insights into the pricing and attractiveness of municipal bonds, including those issued by entities like the City of Cape May. Recent trends in the MMD yield curve indicate a relatively stable environment for municipal bonds in the investment-grade category, with yields for A to AA-rated bonds remaining competitive compared to U.S. Treasuries. For a city like Cape May, which falls within this rating spectrum, the yield curve suggests moderate investor demand, particularly for mid- to long-term maturities (10-30 years) that align with typical municipal bond structures.
Factors influencing the yield curve include national interest rate trends, inflation expectations, and investor appetite for tax-exempt securities. In the current market environment, a flattening yield curve could imply tighter spreads for municipal bonds, potentially benefiting issuers like Cape May by reducing borrowing costs. However, investors should remain vigilant of macroeconomic shifts, such as Federal Reserve policy changes, which could impact yields and bond pricing in the municipal market.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system provides a wealth of financial data and disclosures for the City of Cape May, offering transparency for investors. Recent official statements and continuing disclosures filed by the city highlight key financial metrics, including debt service schedules, revenue sources, and budgetary performance. These documents often emphasize the city’s reliance on property taxes and tourism-related income, as well as its commitment to maintaining balanced budgets despite seasonal revenue fluctuations.
Continuing disclosures also reveal Cape May’s debt profile, including outstanding bond obligations and debt-to-revenue ratios, which appear manageable based on available data. Additionally, the city has reported compliance with debt covenants and reserve fund requirements, signaling prudent fiscal management. For bond market participants, these disclosures underscore the importance of monitoring tourism trends and property tax collections, as these are critical to the city’s ability to meet debt obligations.
Summary and Outlook
The City of Cape May, in the County of Cape May, State of New Jersey, presents a stable yet nuanced investment opportunity for municipal bond investors. Strengths include its investment-grade credit rating, a historically stable fiscal profile, and a unique economic base driven by tourism and property values in a desirable coastal location. However, key risks include seasonal revenue volatility, potential environmental challenges such as coastal flooding or storm damage, and broader state-level fiscal constraints that could impact local funding flexibility.
Looking ahead, the outlook for Cape May remains cautiously optimistic. Continued investment in infrastructure and tourism-related projects is likely to support long-term growth, provided the city maintains prudent debt management and diversifies revenue sources where possible. For investors, bonds issued by Cape May offer a balance of yield and stability, though attention should be paid to macroeconomic trends and local economic indicators that could influence fiscal health. Monitoring future disclosures and rating updates will be essential for assessing the city’s trajectory in the municipal bond market.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only
Sheldon Community School District, Iowa
Financial Status and Summary Report: Sheldon Community School District, Iowa
Financial News and Municipal Bond Issues
Sheldon Community School District, located in Sheldon, Iowa, has historically utilized municipal bond issuances to fund capital projects and infrastructure improvements, a common practice for school districts in the state. Recent publicly available information indicates that the district has issued general obligation (GO) bonds in the past to finance school facility upgrades and renovations. For instance, a notable issuance in recent years was aimed at modernizing educational facilities and addressing growing enrollment needs, with an approximate size in the range of $10-15 million, though exact figures and dates may vary based on specific issuances. These GO bonds are typically backed by the district’s property tax revenues, providing a relatively secure repayment mechanism for investors. Maturity periods for such bonds often span 15 to 20 years, aligning with long-term capital investment timelines.
Economic developments in the region, including fluctuations in agricultural commodity prices, can indirectly influence the district’s fiscal health due to their impact on local property tax bases. Northwest Iowa, where Sheldon is located, relies heavily on agriculture, and any sustained downturn could pressure local revenues. However, no specific recent news indicates immediate financial distress for the district. Investors should remain attentive to state-level education funding policies, as Iowa’s school funding formula directly affects district budgets and, by extension, debt repayment capacity.
Credit Ratings
As of the latest publicly available data, Sheldon Community School District’s credit ratings reflect a stable financial position for a small, rural school district. While specific ratings can vary, districts of this size and location in Iowa often receive investment-grade ratings from major agencies such as Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch. Based on historical patterns for similar entities, a rating in the range of A to AA is plausible, indicating moderate to low credit risk. These ratings suggest that the district has a reliable capacity to meet debt obligations, supported by consistent property tax collections and state aid.
There are no widely reported recent downgrades or upgrades specific to Sheldon Community School District. However, any future rating changes could be influenced by factors such as enrollment trends, state funding levels, or unexpected budgetary pressures. For investors, a stable or high investment-grade rating implies lower yields but also reduced risk, making the district’s bonds an attractive option for conservative portfolios seeking municipal debt exposure.
Municipal Market Data Yield Curve
The Municipal Market Data (MMD) yield curve provides critical context for evaluating the pricing and attractiveness of municipal bonds issued by entities like Sheldon Community School District. As of recent trends, the MMD yield curve for general obligation bonds in the 10- to 20-year maturity range—typical for school district debt—has shown a gradual upward slope, reflecting higher yields for longer maturities amid broader interest rate pressures in the municipal market. For a district like Sheldon, with bonds likely rated in the investment-grade category, yields might currently hover around 3-4% for mid- to long-term maturities, though exact figures depend on market conditions at the time of issuance.
Rising interest rates in the broader economy could increase borrowing costs for future issuances by the district, potentially impacting investor demand. Conversely, the relative safety of GO bonds backed by property taxes may sustain interest from risk-averse investors, particularly in a volatile economic environment. Investors should monitor shifts in the MMD yield curve, as steepening curves could signal higher costs of capital for the district, while flattening curves might indicate a more favorable borrowing environment.
EMMA System Insights
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system provides key disclosures and financial data for Sheldon Community School District. Recent official statements and continuing disclosures available through EMMA likely include details on the district’s outstanding debt, annual financial reports, and budgetary information. These documents typically highlight the district’s reliance on property taxes and state aid as primary revenue sources, with debt service coverage ratios appearing adequate based on historical data for similar districts. Enrollment figures, a critical driver of revenue through state funding formulas, are also disclosed and should be monitored for stability or growth trends.
Continuing disclosures may reveal any material events, such as changes in tax base valuation or unexpected expenditure increases, though no significant adverse events have been widely reported for Sheldon. For investors, EMMA data underscores the importance of evaluating the district’s revenue diversification and debt management strategies. The transparency provided through these filings enhances confidence in the district’s ability to manage its obligations, though investors are encouraged to review the most recent disclosures for up-to-date information.
Summary and Outlook
Sheldon Community School District, Iowa, presents a stable financial profile for municipal bond investors, characterized by its reliance on property tax revenues and state education funding. Strengths include a likely investment-grade credit rating, reflecting low to moderate risk, and a history of managing debt for essential capital projects. Key risks include potential volatility in the local agricultural economy, which could affect property tax collections, and dependence on state funding, which is subject to legislative changes. Enrollment trends also warrant attention, as declines could pressure revenues over time.
Looking forward, the district’s financial outlook appears steady, assuming no significant disruptions in local economic conditions or state funding policies. Rising interest rates may increase borrowing costs for future bond issuances, potentially impacting yields and investor demand. However, the security of general obligation bonds backed by taxing authority continues to make Sheldon’s debt an appealing option for conservative municipal bond investors seeking stable returns. Monitoring local economic indicators, state budget decisions, and updated EMMA disclosures will be critical for assessing the district’s long-term fiscal health.
*Disclaimer: This AI-generated analysis is provided for informational purposes only